San Francisco is having a special election on February 15 for the School Board Recall (aka Board of Education Recall), Assembly District 17, and San Francisco Assessor-Recorder.
If you’re a pissed off voter and want to vote for change, you have to vote for it. Don’t vote for the same people we’ve been electing for decades, vote against the incumbents and for newcomers and political outsiders.
Voting in the ADEM election will let you amplify your vote power by 100x. ADEM
sets the direction of the Democratic Party and controls who earns the
Democratic Party endorsement for State Assembly, State Senate, US House, and US
Voters trust and vote with the Democratic Party endorsements. The endorsements
can easily create a 12% vote margin (about 62,000 votes) in these high-stakes
elections that determine state and national policy.
You must register for ADEMs by January 11, 2021, and some of the prerequisite
steps can take several days, so DO THIS NOW!
I’m doing something a bit different this election… I teamed up with an incredible group of techies to launch the Tech Worker Voter Guide!
We did candidate outreach and performed deep research into every ballot prop. If you live in San Francisco and work in tech, then check out https://techworkers.vote!
We are pro-tech, pro-jobs, pro-immigrant, pro-growth, and pro-progress.
If they are so pissed off with the state of the city, then why did they endorse nearly all of the incumbents running in the upcoming March 2020 election? I guess I’d be pissed off, too, if I kept voting for the same people misgoverning San Francisco year after year!
I’m running for the SF Democratic Party County Central Committee (DCCC) which means, among other things, that I get to fill out a bunch of candidate endorsement questionnaires sent by various local organizations. By far the worst one I saw was for the League of Pissed Off Voters. It’s 5 pages of yes/no questions and demands for loyalty to the NIMBY fauxgressive machine. You aren’t allowed to explain your answers. You aren’t allowed to provide evidence. You must toe the party line.
Here’s how I’m voting in the March, 2020 San Francisco election.
I will use my San Francisco Voting Framework to give you recommendations for the November 2019 election. The numbers in (parenthesis) are the voting principles I’m applying to my endorsement.
If you think we need this kind of rigorous analysis in the Democratic Party, then please support me: Steven Buss for Democratic County Central Committee.
This is my longest-ever voter guide. Not only do I justify my positions on propositions using my voting framework, I explain those choices in depth. Every ballot prop position is justified by some of my 10 voting principles, eg if you see (1, !2) that means the prop satisfies voting principle 1 and undermines principle 2. Here’s the tl;dr, scroll down for detailed explanations.
Why Jane Kim shouldn’t be our next mayor
I think that the only candidate that deserves your vote is London Breed. She is good on housing and is running a positive campaign based on uniting San Francisco. She is smart, capable, has good policy advisers, and is the only candidate who will work with YIMBYs to build more housing.
Tell your friends: Don’t vote for Jane Kim. I prefer London Breed, but Mark Leno would be a fine alternative. Here’s why Jane Kim will be a disaster for our city:
I have a general voting strategy for props which works most of the time time:
- Prefer to vote for new taxes, preferably without a set-aside
- Vote for groups that don’t have a strong lobby (youth, disabled, homeless, low-income people, the environment)
- Vote for social policy change in ways that agree with my values
- Vote for things that price externalities
- Vote against things which increase needless or unhelpful bureaucracy
- Vote against things which infringe upon rights of the people
- Vote against things which undermine good government
- Generally vote against budget set-asides, which limit the ability of representatives to budget effectively
Don’t just vote NO on every ballot initiative. Here’s a justification for my YES and NO votes that fit within a general voting strategy. Feel free to share and/or print this out for election day.
I had previously only posted this on Facebook, but since I’m planning to do this for every election going forward I moved it here.
Don’t just vote NO on every ballot initiative. Here’s a justification for my YES votes that fit within a general voting strategy. Feel free to share and/or print this out for election day.
My voting strategy is:
(1) prefer to vote for new taxes, preferably without a set-aside,
(2) vote for groups that don’t have a strong lobby (youth, disabled, homeless, low-income people),
(3) vote for social policy change in ways that agree with my values,
(4) vote for things that price externalities.
And I try to vote no for everything that doesn’t meet those criteria and/or increases needless or unhelpful bureaucracy (5), or infringes upon rights (6).